Netherlands vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Netherlands
89
in 2014
Saint Lucia
88.56
in 2014
Netherlands rank
55th
Saint Lucia rank
58th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Netherlands
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 89 against 88.56 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.44.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Netherlands ahead.
Netherlands ranks 55th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.16 | 85.41 | 1.75 | Netherlands |
| 2010s | 88.31 | 87.56 | 0.7457 | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Netherlands or Saint Lucia?
- Netherlands, at 89 against 88.56 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Netherlands and Saint Lucia?
- 0.44, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Saint Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Netherlands and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Netherlands ranks 55th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.