Namibia vs Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Namibia
72.98
in 2014
Palestine, State of
70.81
in 2014
Namibia rank
136th
Palestine, State of rank
140th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Namibia
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 72.98 against 70.81 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 2.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Namibia ranks 136th and Palestine, State of ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.28 | 79.8 | 8.52 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 77.51 | 70.22 | 7.29 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Namibia or Palestine, State of?
- Namibia, at 72.98 against 70.81 in Palestine, State of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Namibia and Palestine, State of?
- 2.17, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Palestine, State of?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Namibia and Palestine, State of rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Namibia ranks 136th and Palestine, State of ranks 140th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.