Namibia vs Switzerland: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Namibia
72.98
in 2014
Switzerland
72.77
in 2014
Namibia rank
135th
Switzerland rank
136th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Namibia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 72.98 against 72.77 in Switzerland, a difference of 0.21.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Switzerland ahead.
Namibia ranks 135th and Switzerland ranks 136th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.28 | 77.36 | 6.08 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 77.51 | 74.41 | 3.11 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Namibia or Switzerland?
- Namibia, at 72.98 against 72.77 in Switzerland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Namibia and Switzerland?
- 0.21, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Switzerland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Namibia and Switzerland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Namibia ranks 135th and Switzerland ranks 136th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.