Mozambique vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Mozambique
84.97
in 2014
Uruguay
84.42
in 2014
Mozambique rank
80th
Uruguay rank
81st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Mozambique
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 84.97 against 84.42 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.55.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.
Mozambique ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.96 | 74.26 | 3.3 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 81.79 | 80.59 | 1.2 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mozambique or Uruguay?
- Mozambique, at 84.97 against 84.42 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mozambique and Uruguay?
- 0.55, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mozambique and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Mozambique ranks 80th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.