Morocco vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Morocco
95.97
in 2014
Vietnam
95.64
in 2014
Morocco rank
10th
Vietnam rank
13th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Morocco
  • Vietnam
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 95.97 against 95.64 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.33.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Morocco has been ahead every year.

Morocco ranks 10th and Vietnam ranks 13th of 181 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Vietnam Difference Ahead
2000s 95.26 85.05 10.21 Morocco
2010s 95.92 93.02 2.9 Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Morocco or Vietnam?
Morocco, at 95.97 against 95.64 in Vietnam as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Morocco and Vietnam?
0.33, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Vietnam?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Morocco and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Morocco ranks 10th and Vietnam ranks 13th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.