Montenegro vs Qatar: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Montenegro
87.47
in 2014
Qatar
88.74
in 2014
Montenegro rank
59th
Qatar rank
57th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Montenegro
  • Qatar
020406080100200620102014

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 88.74 against 87.47 in Montenegro, a difference of 1.27.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 59th and Qatar ranks 57th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 86.05 87.94 1.89 Qatar
2010s 87.45 87.33 0.1213 Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Montenegro or Qatar?
Qatar, at 88.74 against 87.47 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Montenegro and Qatar?
1.27, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Qatar?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Montenegro and Qatar rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Montenegro ranks 59th and Qatar ranks 57th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.