Mongolia vs Uganda: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Mongolia
49.13
in 2014
Uganda
47.93
in 2014
Mongolia rank
162nd
Uganda rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Mongolia
- Uganda
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 49.13 against 47.93 in Uganda, a difference of 1.2.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uganda ahead.
Mongolia ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 163rd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.41 | 25.41 | 14 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 39.79 | 31.35 | 8.44 | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mongolia or Uganda?
- Mongolia, at 49.13 against 47.93 in Uganda as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mongolia and Uganda?
- 1.2, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Uganda?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mongolia and Uganda rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Mongolia ranks 162nd and Uganda ranks 163rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.