Mongolia vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Mongolia
49.13
in 2014
Nepal
53.49
in 2014
Mongolia rank
162nd
Nepal rank
160th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Mongolia
  • Nepal
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 53.49 against 49.13 in Mongolia, a difference of 4.36.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 162nd and Nepal ranks 160th of 181 countries.

Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 11.41 39.49 28.09 Nepal
2010s 39.79 54.32 14.53 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mongolia or Nepal?
Nepal, at 53.49 against 49.13 in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mongolia and Nepal?
4.36, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Nepal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mongolia and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Mongolia ranks 162nd and Nepal ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.