Micronesia (country) vs Poland: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Micronesia (country)
86.17
in 2014
Poland
86.06
in 2014
Micronesia (country) rank
70th
Poland rank
72nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Poland
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 86.17 against 86.06 in Poland, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Poland ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 70th and Poland ranks 72nd of 181 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.7 | 86.8 | 9.1 | Poland |
| 2010s | 84.64 | 85.96 | 1.32 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Micronesia (country) or Poland?
- Micronesia (country), at 86.17 against 86.06 in Poland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Micronesia (country) and Poland?
- 0.11, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Poland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Poland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 70th and Poland ranks 72nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.