Mexico vs Slovak Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Mexico
76.27
in 2014
Slovak Republic
75.71
in 2014
Mexico rank
126th
Slovak Republic rank
128th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Mexico
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 76.27 against 75.71 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.56.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Mexico ranks 126th and Slovak Republic ranks 128th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.99 | 81.24 | 12.25 | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 74.9 | 74.84 | 0.066 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Mexico or Slovak Republic?
- Mexico, at 76.27 against 75.71 in Slovak Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Mexico and Slovak Republic?
- 0.56, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Slovak Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mexico and Slovak Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Mexico ranks 126th and Slovak Republic ranks 128th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.