Marshall Islands vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Marshall Islands
93.79
in 2014
Seychelles
93.57
in 2014
Marshall Islands rank
23rd
Seychelles rank
24th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Marshall Islands
- Seychelles
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 93.79 against 93.57 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.22.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 23rd and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.61 | 71.1 | 17.51 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 93.81 | 89.84 | 3.97 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Marshall Islands or Seychelles?
- Marshall Islands, at 93.79 against 93.57 in Seychelles as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Marshall Islands and Seychelles?
- 0.22, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Marshall Islands and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Marshall Islands ranks 23rd and Seychelles ranks 24th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.