Mali vs Mongolia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Mali
55.77
in 2014
Mongolia
49.13
in 2014
Mali rank
159th
Mongolia rank
162nd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Mali
  • Mongolia
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Mali currently reports 55.77 against 49.13 in Mongolia, a difference of 6.64.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Mali ranks 159th and Mongolia ranks 162nd of 181 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 54.77 11.41 43.37 Mali
2010s 55.84 39.79 16.05 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Mali or Mongolia?
Mali, at 55.77 against 49.13 in Mongolia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Mali and Mongolia?
6.64, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Mongolia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mali and Mongolia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Mali ranks 159th and Mongolia ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.