Malaysia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Malaysia
97.49
in 2014
Sri Lanka
96.73
in 2014
Malaysia rank
5th
Sri Lanka rank
6th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Malaysia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 97.49 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.76.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 5th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 183 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.46 | 86.55 | 10.91 | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 98.53 | 94.03 | 4.5 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Malaysia or Sri Lanka?
- Malaysia, at 97.49 against 96.73 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Malaysia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.76, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Malaysia ranks 5th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.