Malaysia vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Malaysia
97.49
in 2014
Singapore
98.91
in 2014
Malaysia rank
5th
Singapore rank
2nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Malaysia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 98.91 against 97.49 in Malaysia, a difference of 1.42.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 183 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.46 | 99.59 | 2.13 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 98.53 | 99.58 | 1.06 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Malaysia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 98.91 against 97.49 in Malaysia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Malaysia and Singapore?
- 1.42, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Singapore?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Malaysia and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Malaysia ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.