MYS vs Samoa: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
MYS
97.49
in 2014
Samoa
98.26
in 2014
MYS rank
5th
Samoa rank
3rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- MYS
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 98.26 against 97.49 in MYS, a difference of 0.77.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was MYS ahead.
MYS ranks 5th and Samoa ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
MYS has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | MYS | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.46 | 91.81 | 5.65 | MYS |
| 2010s | 98.53 | 97.95 | 0.5822 | MYS |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, MYS or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 98.26 against 97.49 in MYS as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between MYS and Samoa?
- 0.77, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for MYS and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do MYS and Samoa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- MYS ranks 5th and Samoa ranks 3rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.