Lithuania vs Slovenia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Lithuania
92.59
in 2014
Slovenia
92.7
in 2014
Lithuania rank
31st
Slovenia rank
29th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Lithuania
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 92.7 against 92.59 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.11.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 29th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.49 | 84.22 | 1.27 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 90.15 | 92.82 | 2.67 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Lithuania or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 92.7 against 92.59 in Lithuania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 0.11, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Lithuania and Slovenia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Lithuania ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 29th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.