Lesotho vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Lesotho
69.83
in 2014
Paraguay
68.63
in 2014
Lesotho rank
140th
Paraguay rank
142nd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Lesotho
  • Paraguay
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 69.83 against 68.63 in Paraguay, a difference of 1.2.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 140th and Paraguay ranks 142nd of 181 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Paraguay Difference Ahead
2000s 65.09 66.71 1.62 Paraguay
2010s 68.59 71.1 2.5 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Lesotho or Paraguay?
Lesotho, at 69.83 against 68.63 in Paraguay as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Lesotho and Paraguay?
1.2, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Paraguay?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Lesotho and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Lesotho ranks 140th and Paraguay ranks 142nd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.