Latvia, Republic of vs Vietnam: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Latvia, Republic of
95.86
in 2014
Vietnam
95.64
in 2014
Latvia, Republic of rank
12th
Vietnam rank
13th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Latvia, Republic of
- Vietnam
How they compare
Latvia, Republic of currently reports 95.86 against 95.64 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.22.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Latvia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Latvia, Republic of ranks 12th and Vietnam ranks 13th of 183 countries.
Latvia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia, Republic of | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.72 | 85.05 | 4.68 | Latvia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 95.14 | 93.02 | 2.12 | Latvia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Latvia, Republic of or Vietnam?
- Latvia, Republic of, at 95.86 against 95.64 in Vietnam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Latvia, Republic of and Vietnam?
- 0.22, with Latvia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia, Republic of and Vietnam?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Latvia, Republic of and Vietnam rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Latvia, Republic of ranks 12th and Vietnam ranks 13th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.