Latvia vs Thailand: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Latvia
95.86
in 2014
Thailand
95.97
in 2014
Latvia rank
12th
Thailand rank
10th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Latvia
  • Thailand
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 95.97 against 95.86 in Latvia, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Thailand ahead.

Latvia ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 10th of 181 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Thailand Difference Ahead
2000s 89.72 89.66 0.0664 Latvia
2010s 95.14 95.12 0.0214 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Latvia or Thailand?
Thailand, at 95.97 against 95.86 in Latvia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Latvia and Thailand?
0.11, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Thailand?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Latvia and Thailand rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Latvia ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 10th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.