Kuwait vs Yemen: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Kuwait
85.29
in 2014
Yemen
85.73
in 2014
Kuwait rank
77th
Yemen rank
75th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Kuwait
  • Yemen
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Yemen currently reports 85.73 against 85.29 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.44.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 77th and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Yemen in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Yemen Difference Ahead
2000s 73.89 71.6 2.29 Kuwait
2010s 81.12 84.48 3.36 Yemen

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Kuwait or Yemen?
Yemen, at 85.73 against 85.29 in Kuwait as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Kuwait and Yemen?
0.44, with Yemen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Yemen?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Kuwait and Yemen rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Kuwait ranks 77th and Yemen ranks 75th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.