Kosovo vs Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Kosovo
72
in 2014
Tonga
97.71
in 2014
Kosovo rank
1st
Tonga rank
4th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Kosovo
  • Tonga
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 97.71 against 72 in Kosovo, a difference of 25.71.

That makes Tonga's figure about 1.4 times Kosovo's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Kosovo ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 4th of 1 groups.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kosovo Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 52.94 99.33 46.39 Tonga
2010s 63.81 97.75 33.94 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Kosovo or Tonga?
Tonga, at 97.71 against 72 in Kosovo as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Kosovo and Tonga?
25.71, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Tonga?
6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
How do Kosovo and Tonga rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Kosovo ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 4th of 1 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.