Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) vs Palestine: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
72
in 2014
Palestine
70.81
in 2014
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
139th
Palestine rank
141st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
- Palestine
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 72 against 70.81 in Palestine, a difference of 1.19.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Palestine ahead.
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Palestine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Palestine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 77.88 | 24.94 | Palestine |
| 2010s | 63.81 | 70.22 | 6.42 | Palestine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) or Palestine?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 72 against 70.81 in Palestine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine?
- 1.19, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2014.
- How do Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) and Palestine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 139th and Palestine ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.