Kazakhstan vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Kazakhstan
0
in 2014
Niger
11.44
in 2014
Kazakhstan rank
175th
Niger rank
173rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Niger
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Niger currently reports 11.44 against 0 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 11.44.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3532 24.28 23.92 Niger
2010s 5.26 21.77 16.51 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Kazakhstan or Niger?
Niger, at 11.44 against 0 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Kazakhstan and Niger?
11.44, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Kazakhstan and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Kazakhstan ranks 175th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.