Japan vs Solomon Islands: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Japan
90.87
in 2014
Solomon Islands
90.63
in 2014
Japan rank
45th
Solomon Islands rank
46th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Japan
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Japan currently reports 90.87 against 90.63 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.24.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 45th and Solomon Islands ranks 46th of 183 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.21 | 77.55 | 13.65 | Japan |
| 2010s | 90.29 | 87.71 | 2.59 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Japan or Solomon Islands?
- Japan, at 90.87 against 90.63 in Solomon Islands as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Japan and Solomon Islands?
- 0.24, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Japan and Solomon Islands rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Japan ranks 45th and Solomon Islands ranks 46th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.