Iraq vs Niger: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Iraq
31.59
in 2014
Niger
11.44
in 2014
Iraq rank
170th
Niger rank
173rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Iraq
  • Niger
0102030200520092014

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 31.59 against 11.44 in Niger, a difference of 20.15.

That makes Iraq's figure about 2.8 times Niger's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Niger ahead.

Iraq ranks 170th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 1.81 24.28 22.47 Niger
2010s 21.14 21.77 0.6281 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Iraq or Niger?
Iraq, at 31.59 against 11.44 in Niger as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Iraq and Niger?
20.15, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Niger?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iraq and Niger rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Iraq ranks 170th and Niger ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.