Indonesia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Indonesia
96.47
in 2014
Sri Lanka
96.73
in 2014
Indonesia rank
7th
Sri Lanka rank
6th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 96.73 against 96.47 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.26.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 183 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3 | 86.55 | 0.2493 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 93.81 | 94.03 | 0.226 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Indonesia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 96.73 against 96.47 in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.26, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Indonesia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Indonesia ranks 7th and Sri Lanka ranks 6th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.