How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Morocco?

10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong (China) vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)

Hong Kong (China)

96.08

in 2014

Morocco

95.97

in 2014

Hong Kong (China) rank

9th

Morocco rank

10th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time

Hong Kong (China)
Morocco

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 96.08 against 95.97 in Morocco, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 9th and Morocco ranks 10th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong (China)	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
2000s	96.13	95.26	0.8665	Hong Kong (China)
2010s	95.8	95.92	0.126	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Hong Kong (China) or Morocco?: Hong Kong (China), at 96.08 against 95.97 in Morocco as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Hong Kong (China) and Morocco?: 0.11, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Morocco?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Morocco rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?: Hong Kong (China) ranks 9th and Morocco ranks 10th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15). Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-db06-15-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/morocco/">Hong Kong (China) vs Morocco: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.