Honduras vs Vanuatu: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Honduras
77.34
in 2014
Vanuatu
76.47
in 2014
Honduras rank
121st
Vanuatu rank
124th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Honduras
  • Vanuatu
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 77.34 against 76.47 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.87.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Honduras ahead.

Honduras ranks 121st and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 181 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Vanuatu Difference Ahead
2000s 73.57 66.3 7.27 Honduras
2010s 78.09 75.76 2.32 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Honduras or Vanuatu?
Honduras, at 77.34 against 76.47 in Vanuatu as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Honduras and Vanuatu?
0.87, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Vanuatu?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Honduras and Vanuatu rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Honduras ranks 121st and Vanuatu ranks 124th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.