Honduras vs Romania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Honduras
77.34
in 2014
Romania
76.58
in 2014
Honduras rank
121st
Romania rank
123rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Honduras
  • Romania
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 77.34 against 76.58 in Romania, a difference of 0.76.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 121st and Romania ranks 123rd of 181 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Romania Difference Ahead
2000s 73.57 66.69 6.88 Honduras
2010s 78.09 74.7 3.39 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Honduras or Romania?
Honduras, at 77.34 against 76.58 in Romania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Honduras and Romania?
0.76, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Romania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Honduras and Romania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Honduras ranks 121st and Romania ranks 123rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.