Guinea vs Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Guinea
89
in 2014
Peru
89.54
in 2014
Guinea rank
55th
Peru rank
53rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Guinea
  • Peru
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Peru currently reports 89.54 against 89 in Guinea, a difference of 0.54.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 55th and Peru ranks 53rd of 181 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 62 90.13 28.12 Peru
2010s 83.18 88.66 5.48 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Guinea or Peru?
Peru, at 89.54 against 89 in Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Guinea and Peru?
0.54, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Peru?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guinea and Peru rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Guinea ranks 55th and Peru ranks 53rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.