Guatemala vs Iran: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Guatemala
79.41
in 2014
Iran
79.52
in 2014
Guatemala rank
110th
Iran rank
109th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Guatemala
  • Iran
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Iran currently reports 79.52 against 79.41 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.11.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 110th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 64.43 54.39 10.04 Guatemala
2010s 78.69 70.27 8.42 Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Guatemala or Iran?
Iran, at 79.52 against 79.41 in Guatemala as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Guatemala and Iran?
0.11, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Iran?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Guatemala and Iran rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Guatemala ranks 110th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.