Grenada vs Spain: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Grenada
80.61
in 2014
Spain
80.39
in 2014
Grenada rank
101st
Spain rank
103rd

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Grenada
  • Spain
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 80.61 against 80.39 in Spain, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Spain ahead.

Grenada ranks 101st and Spain ranks 103rd of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Spain Difference Ahead
2000s 76.63 82.83 6.2 Spain
2010s 80.91 80.58 0.3231 Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Grenada or Spain?
Grenada, at 80.61 against 80.39 in Spain as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Grenada and Spain?
0.22, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Spain?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Grenada and Spain rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Grenada ranks 101st and Spain ranks 103rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.