Greece vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Greece
86.27
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
86.17
in 2014
Greece rank
67th
Micronesia (country) rank
70th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Greece
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Greece currently reports 86.27 against 86.17 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.1.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 67th and Micronesia (country) ranks 70th of 181 countries.
Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.45 | 77.7 | 7.75 | Greece |
| 2010s | 86.2 | 84.64 | 1.56 | Greece |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Greece or Micronesia (country)?
- Greece, at 86.27 against 86.17 in Micronesia (country) as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Greece and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.1, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Greece and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Greece ranks 67th and Micronesia (country) ranks 70th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.