Germany vs United Kingdom: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Germany
86.82
in 2014
United Kingdom
87.04
in 2014
Germany rank
64th
United Kingdom rank
62nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Germany
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 87.04 against 86.82 in Germany, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Germany ahead.
Germany ranks 64th and United Kingdom ranks 62nd of 181 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.59 | 82.75 | 6.83 | Germany |
| 2010s | 88.11 | 86.31 | 1.8 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Germany or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 87.04 against 86.82 in Germany as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Germany and United Kingdom?
- 0.22, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and United Kingdom?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Germany and United Kingdom rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Germany ranks 64th and United Kingdom ranks 62nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.