Georgia vs Guatemala: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Georgia
79.41
in 2014
Guatemala
79.41
in 2014
Georgia rank
110th
Guatemala rank
110th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Georgia
- Guatemala
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 79.41 against 79.41 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 110th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.63 | 64.43 | 2.2 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 77.77 | 78.69 | 0.9151 | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Georgia or Guatemala?
- Georgia, at 79.41 against 79.41 in Guatemala as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Georgia and Guatemala?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Guatemala?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Georgia and Guatemala rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Georgia ranks 110th and Guatemala ranks 110th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.