Gambia vs Greece: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Gambia
86.27
in 2014
Greece
86.27
in 2014
Gambia rank
67th
Greece rank
67th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Gambia
  • Greece
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 86.27 against 86.27 in Greece, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 67th and Greece ranks 67th of 181 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Greece Difference Ahead
2000s 76.44 85.45 9.01 Greece
2010s 84.76 86.2 1.44 Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Gambia or Greece?
Gambia, at 86.27 against 86.27 in Greece as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Gambia and Greece?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Greece?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Gambia and Greece rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Gambia ranks 67th and Greece ranks 67th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.