France vs Liberia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

France
79.85
in 2014
Liberia
80.17
in 2014
France rank
106th
Liberia rank
104th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • France
  • Liberia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 80.17 against 79.85 in France, a difference of 0.32.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was France ahead.

France ranks 106th and Liberia ranks 104th of 181 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Liberia Difference Ahead
2000s 78.81 60.16 18.65 France
2010s 79.33 76.84 2.49 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, France or Liberia?
Liberia, at 80.17 against 79.85 in France as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between France and Liberia?
0.32, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Liberia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do France and Liberia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
France ranks 106th and Liberia ranks 104th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.