France vs Iran: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

France
79.85
in 2014
Iran
79.52
in 2014
France rank
106th
Iran rank
109th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • France
  • Iran
020406080200520092014

How they compare

France currently reports 79.85 against 79.52 in Iran, a difference of 0.33.

Across all 10 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 106th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Iran Difference Ahead
2000s 78.6 54.39 24.22 France
2010s 79.33 70.27 9.06 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, France or Iran?
France, at 79.85 against 79.52 in Iran as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between France and Iran?
0.33, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Iran?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do France and Iran rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
France ranks 106th and Iran ranks 109th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.