Fiji vs Portugal: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Fiji
91.72
in 2014
Portugal
91.94
in 2014
Fiji rank
37th
Portugal rank
36th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Fiji
  • Portugal
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 91.94 against 91.72 in Fiji, a difference of 0.22.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Portugal ahead.

Fiji ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 91.63 93.26 1.63 Portugal
2010s 92.29 92.36 0.0723 Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Fiji or Portugal?
Portugal, at 91.94 against 91.72 in Fiji as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Fiji and Portugal?
0.22, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Portugal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Fiji and Portugal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Fiji ranks 37th and Portugal ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.