Eswatini vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export … export US container DB06-15
Eswatini
65.8
in 2014
Ukraine
67.97
in 2014
Eswatini rank
150th
Ukraine rank
147th
Trading across borders: Cost to export … export US container DB06-15 over time
- Eswatini
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 67.97 against 65.8 in Eswatini, a difference of 2.17.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 150th and Ukraine ranks 147th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.43 | 29.43 | 9 | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 60.62 | 63.47 | 2.85 | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Eswatini or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 67.97 against 65.8 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Eswatini and Ukraine?
- 2.17, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Eswatini ranks 150th and Ukraine ranks 147th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.