Eswatini vs Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Eswatini
65.8
in 2014
Ukraine
67.97
in 2014
Eswatini rank
147th
Ukraine rank
144th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Eswatini
  • Ukraine
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 67.97 against 65.8 in Eswatini, a difference of 2.17.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 147th and Ukraine ranks 144th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 38.43 29.43 9 Eswatini
2010s 60.62 63.47 2.85 Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Eswatini or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 67.97 against 65.8 in Eswatini as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Eswatini and Ukraine?
2.17, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Ukraine?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eswatini and Ukraine rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Eswatini ranks 147th and Ukraine ranks 144th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.