Eswatini vs Gabon: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Eswatini
65.8
in 2014
Gabon
62.2
in 2014
Eswatini rank
147th
Gabon rank
150th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Eswatini
- Gabon
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 65.8 against 62.2 in Gabon, a difference of 3.6.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.
Eswatini ranks 147th and Gabon ranks 150th of 181 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.43 | 56.16 | 17.72 | Gabon |
| 2010s | 60.62 | 62.26 | 1.64 | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Eswatini or Gabon?
- Eswatini, at 65.8 against 62.2 in Gabon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Eswatini and Gabon?
- 3.6, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gabon?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Gabon rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Eswatini ranks 147th and Gabon ranks 150th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.