Estonia vs Pakistan: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Estonia
92.27
in 2014
Pakistan
92.27
in 2014
Estonia rank
33rd
Pakistan rank
33rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Estonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 92.27 against 92.27 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 183 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.43 | 75.56 | 12.87 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 91.22 | 90.83 | 0.3876 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Estonia or Pakistan?
- Estonia, at 92.27 against 92.27 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Estonia and Pakistan?
- 0, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Estonia and Pakistan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Estonia ranks 33rd and Pakistan ranks 33rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.