Eritrea vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Eritrea
68.63
in 2014
South Africa
69.06
in 2014
Eritrea rank
144th
South Africa rank
143rd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Eritrea
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 69.06 against 68.63 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.43.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 144th and South Africa ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.57 | 66.46 | 52.88 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 59.02 | 69.05 | 10.03 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Eritrea or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 69.06 against 68.63 in Eritrea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Eritrea and South Africa?
- 0.43, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Eritrea and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Eritrea ranks 144th and South Africa ranks 143rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.