Eritrea vs Lesotho: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Eritrea
68.63
in 2014
Lesotho
69.83
in 2014
Eritrea rank
142nd
Lesotho rank
140th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Eritrea
  • Lesotho
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 69.83 against 68.63 in Eritrea, a difference of 1.2.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 142nd and Lesotho ranks 140th of 181 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 13.57 65.09 51.51 Lesotho
2010s 59.02 68.59 9.57 Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Eritrea or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 69.83 against 68.63 in Eritrea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Eritrea and Lesotho?
1.2, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Lesotho?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Eritrea and Lesotho rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Eritrea ranks 142nd and Lesotho ranks 140th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.