El Salvador vs Gambia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
El Salvador
86.17
in 2014
Gambia
86.27
in 2014
El Salvador rank
71st
Gambia rank
68th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- El Salvador
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 86.27 against 86.17 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 71st and Gambia ranks 68th of 184 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.37 | 76.44 | 13.93 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 87 | 84.76 | 2.24 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), El Salvador or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 86.27 against 86.17 in El Salvador as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between El Salvador and Gambia?
- 0.1, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Gambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do El Salvador and Gambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- El Salvador ranks 71st and Gambia ranks 68th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.