Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Israel: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Egypt, Arab Republic of
95.32
in 2014
Israel
95.42
in 2014
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
16th
Israel rank
15th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 95.42 against 95.32 in Egypt, Arab Republic of, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 16th and Israel ranks 15th of 183 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt, Arab Republic of | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.24 | 92.9 | 22.66 | Israel |
| 2010s | 92.22 | 94.55 | 2.32 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Egypt, Arab Republic of or Israel?
- Israel, at 95.42 against 95.32 in Egypt, Arab Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Israel?
- 0.1, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Israel?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Israel rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 16th and Israel ranks 15th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.