Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Finland: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Egypt, Arab Republic of
95.32
in 2014
Finland
95.53
in 2014
Egypt, Arab Republic of rank
16th
Finland rank
14th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 95.53 against 95.32 in Egypt, Arab Republic of, a difference of 0.21.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 16th and Finland ranks 14th of 183 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt, Arab Republic of | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.24 | 96.22 | 25.99 | Finland |
| 2010s | 92.22 | 95.27 | 3.05 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Egypt, Arab Republic of or Finland?
- Finland, at 95.53 against 95.32 in Egypt, Arab Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Finland?
- 0.21, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Finland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Finland rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 16th and Finland ranks 14th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.