Ecuador vs Maldives: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Ecuador
75.49
in 2014
Maldives
73.53
in 2014
Ecuador rank
129th
Maldives rank
132nd
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Ecuador
- Maldives
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 75.49 against 73.53 in Maldives, a difference of 1.96.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Ecuador ranks 129th and Maldives ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.15 | 68.58 | 0.4221 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 73.49 | 71.69 | 1.8 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Ecuador or Maldives?
- Ecuador, at 75.49 against 73.53 in Maldives as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Ecuador and Maldives?
- 1.96, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Maldives?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Maldives rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Ecuador ranks 129th and Maldives ranks 132nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.