Dominican Republic vs Micronesia: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
86.27
in 2014
Micronesia
86.17
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
68th
Micronesia rank
71st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Micronesia
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 86.27 against 86.17 in Micronesia, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Micronesia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Micronesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.36 | 77.7 | 4.66 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 84.33 | 84.64 | 0.3138 | Micronesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Dominican Republic or Micronesia?
- Dominican Republic, at 86.27 against 86.17 in Micronesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Micronesia?
- 0.1, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Micronesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Micronesia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Micronesia ranks 71st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.