Dominican Republic vs Germany: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Dominican Republic
86.27
in 2014
Germany
86.82
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
68th
Germany rank
65th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Germany
How they compare
Germany currently reports 86.82 against 86.27 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.55.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Germany ranks 65th of 183 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.36 | 89.59 | 7.22 | Germany |
| 2010s | 84.33 | 88.11 | 3.77 | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Dominican Republic or Germany?
- Germany, at 86.82 against 86.27 in Dominican Republic as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Dominican Republic and Germany?
- 0.55, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Germany?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Germany rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 68th and Germany ranks 65th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.